Reliability by construction

Break it deliberately before production does.

Vuo's reliability approach is to make dangerous boundaries explicit, inject failures there, and verify durable outcomes instead of relying on hopeful retries.

Destination disappears mid-transfer

Expected outcome: source remains intact, partial destination never receives the final filename, retry resumes safely, and one verified final output exists.

Scenario

Runtime dies after final rename

Expected outcome: existing output is reconciled using durable evidence instead of blindly writing another copy.

Scenario

Custom processor hangs

Processor Host isolation is designed to let Vuo terminate the bad execution while Runtime and unrelated Flows stay healthy.

Architecture

Disk space approaches exhaustion

Storage Guard cleans only safe expired data, can compress retained evidence, and restricts new storage-heavy work before uncontrolled failures begin.

Architecture

Reliability Lab

Evidence, not adjectives.

Rather than calling the platform “enterprise-grade”, Vuo aims to make reliability scenarios reproducible and their results inspectable.

ScenarioMid-transfer destination failure

Data lossNone

Duplicate final outputNone

Source preservedYes

RecoveryAutomatic retry

ResultPASS

Containment

Slow down instead of failing faster.

Guard services are intended to keep abnormal workloads, storage pressure and bad custom processors from spreading damage across the installation.

Volume Guard

Observe unexpected rates and optionally throttle or pause intake without silently dropping durable work.

Storage Guard

Monitor free space, enforce retention, reclaim expired data and keep storage-heavy work from exhausting the volume.

Processor Pools

Bound custom code by process, memory, CPU and timeout policies so one broken processor does not own the machine.